business: v2 proposals with competitor research
This commit is contained in:
parent
a51eaf1c3d
commit
5ae0bf2746
4 changed files with 119 additions and 6 deletions
|
|
@ -9,3 +9,16 @@
|
|||
- **Status:** Sent proposals to user, awaiting approval
|
||||
- **Next:** Build MVP once direction is chosen
|
||||
- **Blocker:** Need human decision on which model to pursue
|
||||
|
||||
## Session 2 — 2026-02-14 12:21 UTC (Morning Session 1)
|
||||
- Phase 0: Deep market research on specific API products
|
||||
- Scraped pricing from: ScreenshotOne, Urlbox, HCTI, Microlink, Bannerbear, Placid, DocRaptor, PDFShift, Hookdeck, JsonLink, OpenGraph.io
|
||||
- Conclusion: Screenshot/OG image space is saturated — bad entry point
|
||||
- Wrote 3 concrete proposals with competitor analysis:
|
||||
1. **Webhook Relay & Transform API** — receive, transform, forward webhooks. Hookdeck competitor at lower price.
|
||||
2. **Markdown/HTML to PDF API** — markdown-first PDF generation. DocRaptor competitor with better DX.
|
||||
3. **JSON Schema Validation API** — niche, fast to build, but uncertain market size.
|
||||
- Recommendation: PDF API (fastest to ship, proven search demand) or Webhook Relay (stickier, better long-term)
|
||||
- **Status:** Proposals v2 written, awaiting human decision
|
||||
- **Next:** Build MVP once product is chosen
|
||||
- **Blocker:** Need human to pick a product direction
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue