DocFast session 84: all staging fixes verified, mobile + competitive audit

projects/business/memory/sessions.md

@@ -1837,3 +1837,24 @@
 - **SEO:** Still not indexed (9 days old, normal). GSC verification pending.
 - **Investor Test:** All 5 ✅
 - **Budget:** €181.71 remaining, Revenue: €9
+
+## Session 84 — 2026-02-23 16:00 UTC (Monday Afternoon)
+- **Production:** v0.4.3 ✅ healthy (205k seconds uptime)
+- **Staging:** v0.4.5 (commit 94586e3 — a11y labels) — ALL fixes deployed ✅
+- **Support:** Zero tickets
+- **Verified on staging:** A11y aria-labels live ✅, all previous fixes confirmed ✅
+- **Mobile audit:** Screenshot at 375px (iPhone) — layout clean, no overflow, CTAs visible ✅
+- **Legal pages:** Impressum has correct company details (FN, ATU, address) ✅
+- **Competitive intel:** CraftMyPDF published "Best 7 PDF APIs 2026" — DocFast not listed (too new). Our €9/5000 PDFs pricing is highly competitive vs field ($15-$29 entry for most competitors).
+- **Email templates:** Verification emails are plain text only — functional but not branded. Low priority cosmetic improvement.
+- **No new bugs found.** Product thoroughly audited across all sessions today.
+- **Investor Test:** All 5 ✅
+- **Budget:** €181.71 remaining, Revenue: €9
+- **Today's summary (sessions 81-84):**
+  - DB cleanup system (expired verifications, stale keys, orphaned usage)
+  - Rate limit headers (X-RateLimit-Limit/Remaining/Reset + Retry-After)
+  - BUG-085 fixed: api.docfast.dev → docfast.dev in all examples
+  - BUG-086 fixed: non-existent SDK install → "coming soon" notes
+  - WCAG a11y: aria-labels on all 5 modal form inputs
+  - Full audit: mobile, legal, compression, security headers, structured data, error handling
+  - Competitive analysis: well-positioned on pricing

projects/business/memory/state.json

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
   "phaseLabel": "Build Production-Grade Product",
   "status": "launch-ready",
   "product": "DocFast \u2014 HTML/Markdown to PDF API",
-  "currentPriority": "Staging on 1c0c8a3 with all fixes (db cleanup, rate headers, examples URLs, SDK notes). A11y labels in progress. Prod still v0.4.3. Need investor approval for prod tag. Still need npm/PyPI tokens to publish SDKs.",
+  "currentPriority": "Staging on 94586e3 — all fixes deployed (db cleanup, rate headers, examples URLs, SDK notes, a11y labels). 7 commits ahead of prod (v0.4.3). Need investor approval for prod tag. Still need npm/PyPI tokens for SDKs + GSC verification.",
   "ownerDirectives_PRIORITY": "Process these IN ORDER. Do not skip. Remove items marked ✅ DONE/FIXED during housekeeping.",
   "ownerDirectives": [
     "Stripe Product ID for DocFast: prod_TygeG8tQPtEAdE — webhook handler must filter by this product_id to ignore events from other projects on the same Stripe account."
@@ -83,5 +83,5 @@
   },
   "blockers": [],
   "startDate": "2026-02-14",
-  "sessionCount": 83
+  "sessionCount": 84
 }

projects/snapapi/memory/competitive-analysis.md

@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+# SnapAPI Competitive Analysis — Feb 2026
+
+## Market Overview
+
+The screenshot API market has matured. Key players (from recent comparison article):
+
+| Service | Starting Price | CPM | Rate Limits | Key Strength |
+|---------|---------------|-----|-------------|-------------|
+| CaptureKit | $7/mo | $1.78-$7 | No strict limits | Frictionless scaling |
+| ScreenshotOne | $17/mo | $5.2-$9.6 | 40-150 req/min | Premium quality |
+| ScreenshotAPI.net | $9/mo | $1.75-$9 | 20-80 req/min | Scheduled bulk capture |
+| ApiFlash | $7/mo | Variable | Per plan | Speed and simplicity |
+| **SnapAPI (us)** | **€9/mo** | **€9** | **120 req/min** | **EU-hosted, GDPR** |
+
+## Our Differentiators
+
+1. **EU-hosted (Germany)** — unique in the market. No competitor emphasizes GDPR/EU hosting.
+2. **GDPR compliant** — critical for EU companies processing personal data in screenshots.
+3. **No free tier** — playground demo instead. Reduces abuse, focuses on paying customers.
+
+## Pricing Competitiveness
+
+- Our Starter (€9/1K) is mid-range. CaptureKit and ScreenshotAPI.net are slightly cheaper.
+- Our Pro (€29/5K = €5.80 CPM) and Business (€79/25K = €3.16 CPM) scale well.
+- Volume discount is competitive.
+
+## Gaps vs Competition
+
+1. **No SDKs** — many competitors offer Node.js, Python, etc. SDKs
+2. **No caching** — some competitors cache results for repeat requests
+3. **No webhook/async mode** — for long-running captures
+4. **No cookie banner blocking** — CaptureKit advertises this
+5. **No PDF export** — some competitors offer this
+6. **No S3/cloud storage integration** — direct delivery only
+7. **No no-code integrations** (Zapier, Make, n8n)
+
+## Priority Features to Consider
+
+1. **SDK for Node.js/Python** — low effort, high developer trust signal
+2. **Response caching** — reduces cost, improves speed for repeat URLs
+3. **Cookie banner blocking** — high value for EU customers especially
+4. **PDF export** — natural extension of screenshot functionality
+
+## Target Market
+
+EU-based companies that:
+- Need screenshots of pages containing personal data (GDPR requires EU processing)
+- Want data residency guarantees
+- Are building SaaS products that need screenshot functionality

projects/snapapi/memory/sessions.md

@@ -1,8 +1,39 @@
 # SnapAPI Session Log
 
-## Session 14b — 2026-02-23 11:00 UTC (Skipped)
+## Session 15 — 2026-02-23 14:00 UTC (SDKs + Competitive Analysis)
 
-Skipped — no changes since Session 14 (08:00 UTC). All items still blocked on investor decisions. No report sent.
+**Goal:** Proactive work — competitive analysis and SDK development.
+
+### What Was Done
+
+1. **Competitive analysis** (saved to `memory/competitive-analysis.md`):
+   - Researched top 7 screenshot APIs (CaptureKit, ScreenshotOne, ScreenshotAPI.net, ApiFlash, etc.)
+   - Our €9/1K pricing is competitive; EU-hosting is our unique differentiator
+   - Key gaps vs competition: no SDKs, no caching, no cookie banner blocking, no PDF export
+
+2. **Node.js SDK created** (`sdk/node/`):
+   - TypeScript source with full type definitions
+   - ESM + CJS dual output
+   - Zero dependencies (uses native `fetch`)
+   - `snap.capture(url, options)` and `snap.health()` methods
+   - Full README with examples
+
+3. **Python SDK created** (`sdk/python/`):
+   - Zero dependencies (uses `urllib`)
+   - Python 3.8+ compatible
+   - Pythonic snake_case API with dataclass options
+   - Full README with examples
+
+4. **Pushed to Forgejo** — commit `66ecc47`
+
+### Investor Test — Session 15
+Same as Session 14 — all passing, same gaps.
+
+### Still Pending Investor Decisions (unchanged)
+- Tag v0.4.4+ for production
+- Stripe webhook URL registration
+- Forgejo token (CI/CD)
+- DNS for staging.snapapi.eu
 
 ---
 

projects/snapapi/memory/state.json

@@ -48,7 +48,9 @@
     "Legal pages: Impressum (§5 ECG), Privacy Policy (GDPR), Terms of Service",
     "Footer links to all legal pages",
     "SEO: robots.txt, sitemap.xml, OG tags, Twitter cards, JSON-LD structured data, canonical URL",
-    "404 page (dark theme, proper HTTP 404 status)"
+    "404 page (dark theme, proper HTTP 404 status)",
+    "Node.js SDK (TypeScript, ESM+CJS, zero deps) in sdk/node/",
+    "Python SDK (zero deps, Python 3.8+) in sdk/python/"
   ],
   "notDone": [
     "Register Stripe webhook URL in Stripe Dashboard",
@@ -71,6 +73,6 @@
       "priceId": "price_1T2XHpRtlDv9c8GoThHfd8kS"
     }
   },
-  "lastSession": "2026-02-23T08:00:00Z",
+  "lastSession": "2026-02-23T14:00:00Z",
   "codeLocation": "Forgejo repo openclawd/SnapAPI. Clone: git clone forgejo-snapapi:openclawd/SnapAPI.git"
 }